Canada to test the moral question

Some of my friends say so, Canada's largest electrical retailer is recruiting, Rs Gold I went door-to-door to find. However, large companies have a large company rules, it is necessary to enter the company must first pass an ethics test. I pick up the pen, take place overnight. But who would have thought the first 2 days, we were told: never been tested. How could it? I am trying to find an old immigration advice, do not have to ask a question only sigh Canada and the Chinese people, culture and even worse in other days. In this test, the first question is this: Do you work in the past several years, the company has won permission to go home things? A: never; B: the value of not more than 5 yuan; C: value is not more than 20 yuan; D: is not worth more than 100 yuan. How the work of the unit may never took the company's something to go home? Therefore, option A is certainly a trap, before the election that Runescape Power leveling it is not honest, so I selected B, did not hesitate. The second question: Are you one of my colleagues took the company a dollar rather than declare, owner of the following do you think is appropriate? A: criticism; B: prevent it from upgrading or its demotion; C: dismissed; D: report to the police, the prosecution staff. According to my own ideas, choose B and A is also understandable, the choice of C has been far, D is not taken into account. But I know that Canadians may be more important this kind of thing, so unconscionable chose C. The third question: Do you buy things in stores back home,Runescape money saw sales revenue by one dollar of your money, your car will be returned back to him? (The cost of driving more than 1 yuan.) At that time, I think this is a trap, some people really do such a thing here? China said it was not the money be confused support it? So the election will not, at that time was very sincere own a lot of moving. We all know the result: The first question can not win the election; Runescape Gold the second question should be prosecuted (in Canada, even if the company is using the documents home to work overtime, it must be in charge after the agreement, or else very serious nature, Belonging to the theft, the company should be fully prosecuted, let alone a dollar in cash); the third question should also be back.